controversial goal

After three years of debate, finally FIFA would mererapkan Hawk-Eye technology start diajang Premier League next season. Ynag technology has been applied in the sport of tennis and cricket is only takes half a second to determine the accuracy of a goal.
Although already agreed, FIFA will not apply this advanced technology in every Premier League matches. FIFA together with the new FA will conduct experiments on three unnamed stadium for six months. This decision was taken because FIFA wanted to ensure the Hawk-eye technology is really 100% accurate.
"If a technology can be used to develop football, why not? Sepp Blatter has clearly said, if there is new technology that could be applied in the world of football, we should be able to accept it," said FIFA general secretary Jerome Valcke.
This is very encouraging news for Paul Hawkins, chief executive of the company creator of Hawk-eye. "Sistemkami for bolasebenarnya football is technically easier than cricket. This technology is not to exclude anyone, but to make things better," he said.
 

According to Hawkins stated that he has done 250 simulations are considered somewhat kontriversial goals so far. In conclusion, approximately 72 percent of the referee's decision was correct, 76 percent of the assistant referee's decision is correct, and 81 percent of the official decision was right behind the goal.
Although he was handed the data to FIFA, FIFA President, Sepp Blatter, still objected. He said not all the ground movements can be recorded by the technology and cameras.
Blatter should insist with his opinion. But the current controversy occurred more often in football. Who is blamed when the problem occurs again. No other than the courts are often the target field.
The referee would not be mistakes, there must be some incidents that escaped from his sight. Automatic Hawk-eye technology like this will greatly help the performance of the referee in the field.